.github/workflows | ||
Dockerfile | ||
license.patch | ||
README.md |
OnlyOffice Community server with license
Usage
Podman CLI
podman run \
--name=onlyoffice \
--detach \
--publish=80:80 \
docker.io/alehoho/oo-ce-docker-license
Docker CLI
docker run \
--name=onlyoffice \
--detach \
--publish=80:80 \
alehoho/oo-ce-docker-license
docker-compose.yml
services:
onlyoffice:
container_name: onlyoffice
image: alehoho/oo-ce-docker-license
ports:
- "80"
Build
Buildah CLI
buildah build-using-dockerfile \
--tag=onlyoffice-patched \
https://github.com/aleho/onlyoffice-ce-docker-license.git
Docker CLI
docker build \
--tag=onlyoffice-patched \
https://github.com/aleho/onlyoffice-ce-docker-license.git
docker-compose.yml
services:
onlyoffice:
container_name: onlyoffice
image: onlyoffice-patched
build:
context: https://github.com/aleho/onlyoffice-ce-docker-license.git
…
Verify
To verify that the container is running successfully open
[server-url]/healthcheck
(has to return true
) and for the version number open
[server-url]/web-apps/apps/api/documents/api.js
and check the header comment.
Background
Recently, just about a month after Nextcloud announced their partnership with Ascensio and featuring a community version of OnlyOffice, the latter decided to remove support for mobile editing of documents via the Nextcloud app.
This happened without any prior notice and alienated quite a lot of home users, who would now be forced to pay more than €1.000 to unlock that previously free feature. Only after some outcries Ascensio deigned to release a statement and a new, albeit "limited", offer of €90 for home servers.
In my opinion these deceptive practices are unacceptable for a company advertising itself and their product as open source.
Thanks
This repo was heavily inspired by the works of Zegorax/OnlyOffice-Unlimited.